Sit Uas «Easy SECRETS»

Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) present candidates with realistic, work-related scenarios and ask them to rate or choose among possible actions. SJTs predict job performance in many high-stakes professions (medicine, air traffic control) by assessing procedural knowledge and tacit decision-making rules (Lievens & Sackett, 2012). However, no validated SJT currently exists for UAS operators.

Traditional technical assessments for UAS pilots focus on procedural knowledge, yet most operational failures stem from poor judgement under ambiguous or time-critical conditions. Existing selection tools lack scenario-based items specific to UAS challenges (e.g., beyond visual line of sight operations, lost link procedures). sit uas

Development and Validation of a Situational Judgement Test (SIT-UAS) for Unmanned Aircraft System Operators: Predicting Non-Technical Skills in Remote Piloting Traditional technical assessments for UAS pilots focus on

Situational Judgement Test, Unmanned Aircraft Systems, non-technical skills, pilot selection, human factors. 1. Introduction The proliferation of UAS (drones) across civil, commercial, and military domains has increased demand for effective operator selection and training (ICAO, 2022). While technical proficiency in flight control is measurable, critical incidents often involve failures of judgement—e.g., prioritizing a visual fix over battery state, or misinterpreting controller handoffs. or misinterpreting controller handoffs.